8.22.2012

Wading through the Weeds - Deselection and Me


Collections are big and ungainly things. No matter how hard you try, they grow like topsy. But like any weedy thing, too much growth sucks up space, oxygen and *things* start taking over. Soon the weedy things completely obscure the healthy things and before you know it, kids and families start wandering aimlessly through the growth praying to the gods and goddesses to get them out of there.

Ah, it is clearly August in libraryland. A time when the minds of youth librarians turn to tending those shelves and making some progress through the weeds. There I found myself today working with a colleague and talking about what, for me, is an absolute favorite library activity - deselection!

Maybe I like it because weeding as an activity is a microcosm of management - a hundred tiny decisions that need to be made with confidence. Some are quick; some are slower and some can't be made at just that moment and the book needs to be re-shelved to see how it fares for a little more time.  Perhaps a bit more face-out display time for this one or handselling to kids might jumpstart it. There is an element of careful consideration and finesse that I enjoy as well.

Today we were in chapter books discussing the kind of criteria that we need to think about to make good weeding decisions.  Condition is always easy (Eeeee-yooooo = toss!). Of course, if it's popular, then we need to re-order. 

How is the circulation on the item?  With a three week check-out period, an item could have 17 circs per year in a perfect world of everyone keeping books exactly three weeks and no overdues. But more realistically, we expect most chapter books to have an annual turnover average of 4-6 circs. Way over that number and we may buy an additional copy. Way under...oh-oh, not making the shelf-rent and we'll have to evict you.

What is this book really?  Has it stood the test of time and emerged as a keeper?  Has the story, the writing, the plot and the language endured and found a home with the readers in our community.  We have many books that are between 4-5 years old that have not crossed over that divide.  Reviewed well but never truly a fit; sadly un-checked out; written by authors once - or never- popular, these books need thought but often must leave the island as well.

Books that are pedestrain in content (think the equivalent of series nonfiction - churned out; undistinguished; full of bad cover art and clearly aimed at a school audience that needs to "keep to a reading level") are an easy fling.  Books once popular but fading in appreciation (oh Beverly Cleary, this is killing me), get to stay but only in a guilty way.  As a resource library, we can always make the argument that our collection needs to be deep after all.

And finally, how does the book fit into the overall collection. Is it just one of eleventy-zillion fantasies and a poor circ'er? Good-bye. Is it our only book written from the viewpoint of a camel (let me check the circ on that and get back to you) with fairly wretched original reviews?  Buy-bye. Do we only have the third book in the series and the rest are out of print? Sayonara.

Though the reader in me calls out to keep them all, the realist knows that we have reached a capacity that calls for one book weeded for every one cataloged. So it comforts me to think of these books going to our Friends who will sell them and give us the money to fund our programs and initiatives.

And don't our shelves look dandy and the beep of increased circs for the remaining books sound nice?

Image: 'La caverne aux livres' http://www.flickr.com/photos/24183489@N00/395079578

12 comments:

  1. I too, love weeding, for many of the same reasons. I also love how intimately I get to know the collection when I weed, because I often combine weeding with shelf reading and inventory. So when kids and families come in, I can often just walk them straight to the shelf, chatting about this great book I have in mind. Right now I've been dealing with a 20-year-old nonfiction collection (oh the horrifying gems to be found there!), but I am anxious to really work with the fiction collection to improve my readers' advisory. I find myself recommending great books the previous children's librarian didn't purchase at least once a week. I don't have the budget to go back and buy all of these, so I need to work on finding similar titles we do have, so I'm not constantly placing holds for people rather than a book in their hands.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, great to discover your blog! You're on my roll now. And we love your ninja program..we're thinking Ninjago!

      Delete
  2. What a timely post. I've been working my way through the J nonfiction (painfully slowly during SRP)and it feels so good to pitch though I do have trouble convincing some of my staff of the benefits. Must be some of that old Yankee thrift. Time to put on a burst of speed and plow through the 500s before school gets going.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know...people are so funny about their reluctance to weed. I wonder if their houses are full of clutter and they have the same trouble parting with that?

      Delete
  3. I totally agree, Marge! Weeding is such a cathartic experience for me and my shelves. We just started using Collection HQ, and it's pretty interesting to see what actually circs and what doesn't. Thanks for the post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. oooh, I never heard of Collection HQ. Thanks for the tip!

      Delete
    2. I think I like is so far... You can run fun reports like who your most circulated authors are, what sections need beefed up, etc. We just started it in our library system, so the jury's still out!

      Delete
  4. I've been busy weeding my J Bios this week and it's been a great experience. I feel like I've got a better handle on what famous people my kids come into research and which ones they do not. Bios in particular are a struggling collection in some ways since so much more up to date information can be found on one of my library's databases. BUT for the really younger kids just learning what a bio is, this collection needs to stronger. And now I know who I want to re-order too! This collection is going to look so shiny and new soon.

    ReplyDelete
  5. We just strted with Collection HQ this spring too. I love how easy it is to tidy up the Excel spreadsheets, our ILS weeding reports were never so easy to use.

    ReplyDelete
  6. For those who need a little extra help, be sure to check out CREW: A Weeding Manual for Modern Libraries, https://www.tsl.state.tx.us/ld/pubs/crew/index.html. It's free.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, CREW gives folks the confidence that they can - and should - weed!

      Delete
  7. I just finished weeding our children's biographies. That was tough. So many famous people but not enough interest. Pity. Oh, well, makes room for some new and interesting people.
    Still working through the forced non-fiction weeding. Got new shelves and have about 50 less than we had before. That line in the CREW manual--"weed ruthlessly" gives me inspiration to continue this purge. But it will be well worth it in the end to have shelves with the up-to-date material clearly visible and a better appearance all the way around.
    If only I could do the same at my house.....alas.

    ReplyDelete